National Evaluators in the Regional Service-Learning Award (RSLA)

National evaluators play a key role in ensuring the quality and fairness of the Regional Service-Learning Award (RSLA). Their task is to assess submitted Service-Learning projects at the national level, following clear guidelines, shared criteria, and strong ethical standards.

Training for Evaluators

To ensure fair and consistent evaluations, national evaluators take part in a structured training programme. The training explains the RSLA process and criteria and includes practical exercises with real project examples. Evaluators compare results, discuss differences, and align their understanding to ensure reliable and transparent evaluations. LINK TO ACCESS THE DOCUMENT.

Code of Conduct

Evaluators must work independently and objectively. All decisions are based only on the information provided in the application and on the official RSLA criteria. Evaluators must declare any conflict of interest and withdraw from evaluating a project if needed. Confidentiality is essential, and evaluators must not share application details or communicate results directly to applicants. LINK TO ACCESS THE DOCUMENT.

Evaluation Process

National evaluators review projects using official RSLA evaluation tools. Each project must first meet five basic eligibility conditions. Eligible projects are then scored against quality criteria, with a maximum of 80 points. Only projects that reach the required score and meet all conditions can be nominated for the international evaluation round. For nominated projects, evaluators prepare a short, anonymous summary in English for the international jury. LINK TO ACCESS THE DOCUMENT.

Through clear instructions, ethical standards, and proper training, national evaluators help maintain the quality, credibility, and impact of the Regional Service-Learning Award across the region

The support of the European Commission for the publication of this document does not imply that the Commission endorses the contents of the publication, which reflects only the views of the authors. Therefore, the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use of the information contained herein.